Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s SEXUAL harassment lawsuit has finally come to an end. The judge ruled that the defendant was guilty and the sentence was “guilty of…read more

Reps for both Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni reacted to the judge’s decision and shared their plans moving forward in discovery

Blake Lively  has been granted a modified protective order in her legal battle against Blake Lively  and others involved in Blake Lively , but the court limited the scope of the restrictions she sought.

On Thursday, March 13, Judge Lewis J. Liman ruled that while certain confidential materials will remain protected, an “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” designation can only be applied if their disclosure is “highly likely to cause a significant business, commercial, financial or privacy injury.”

The decision follows Lively’s request for stricter safeguards to prevent private details from leaking to the media or circulating within Hollywood. The judge acknowledged the risk of sensitive information spreading through industry gossip, writing in his ruling.

“And where confidential information is not disclosed to the media, it may spread by gossip and innuendo to those in the tight artistic community in a position to do harm to one or the other of the parties but in a manner that might not be readily and immediately detected.”

A spokesperson for Lively says in a statement, “Today, the Court rejected the Wayfarer Parties’ objections and entered the protections needed to ensure the free flow of discovery material without any risk of witness intimidation or harm to any individual’s security. With this order in place, Ms. Lively will move forward in the discovery process to obtain even more of the evidence that will prove her claims in court.”

Justin Baldoni; Blake Lively. James Devaney/GC Images; Mat Hayward/WireImage

The ruling reinforced that AEO designations should not require case-by-case discussions if the information type is generally considered appropriate for such protection.

Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, issued a statement after the court’s decision, emphasizing that the defense had never sought the kind of deeply personal information Lively claimed needed extra protection.

“We are fully in agreement with the Court’s decision to provide a narrow scope of protections to categories such as private mental health records and personal security measures that have never been of interest to us, as opposed to Ms. Lively’s exceedingly overbroad demand for documents for a 2.5-year period of time, which the court rightly quashed. We remain focused on the necessary communications that will directly contradict Ms. Lively’s unfounded accusations.”

Lively’s attorneys had requested a broad confidentiality order that would have limited access to certain materials, arguing that the lawsuit’s high-profile nature created an increased risk of leaks. Her legal team claimed that keeping some documents restricted to lawyers only was necessary to prevent reputational harm and media scrutiny.

Baldoni’s team pushed back, arguing that Lively’s request was excessive and could prevent critical evidence from being accessed during the case.

The court ultimately rejected her attempt to impose strict limitations on all materials and instead focused on specific protections for highly personal information

Related Posts

“Cooper Flagg” suffered a serious injury that left many questions as Duke and North Carolina faced off in the ACC Tournament. As Cooper Flagg faced the possibility of never …read more

The star freshman going down on Thursday in the quarterfinals could have quite the ripple effect There was a development in the ACC Tournament on Thursday that could have ramifications…

Read more

“Donald Trump Jr.”, the President’s son, expressed his extreme anger and annoyance when his ex-wife Vanessa Trump dated Tiger Woods and he declared “I will use …see more

Golfer Tiger Woods has been in the news lately after his latest injury setback as he is out for the foreseeable future after having surgery on a ruptured Achilles tendon….

Read more

Vanessa Trump The ex-wife of the son of President “Donald Trump Jr.” dated Tiger Woods and it was shocking to know his attitude when he declared 1 word…see more

Donald Trump Jr. isn’t upset about his ex-wife Vanessa Trump’s new relationship with golfing legend Tiger Woods. That’s according to People, which reported that Trump Jr. had a 1-word response…

Read more

KIM SAE RON’s mother, who suffered facial paralysis after her daughter’s death, directly refuted KIM SOO HYUN’s side and released evidence when he and his daughter entered the …see more

The incident involving the relationship between two Korean actors Kim Sae Ron and Kim Soo Hyun has attracted public attention, especially after Kim Sae Ron’s mother spoke out to refute…

Read more

SHOCKING NEWS: “Yoo Yeon Seok” evaded 7 billion won (Nearly 5 million dollars) in taxes and after being discovered, he …see more

According to TV Report, actor Yoo Yeon Seok has just been asked to pay 7 billion won in taxes, but the actor’s side opposes this decision. CEO Yoo Yeon Seok…

Read more

“Kim Kardashian” Lost a DIAMOND worth 600 million dollars. She panicked and decided to announce at the party that whoever found it would be rewarded with a huge sum of money worth…see more

American reality TV star Kim Kardashian panicked when she lost a diamond at the lavish wedding of Asia’s richest billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s son in Mumbai. n a recent episode of The…

Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *