Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s SEXUAL harassment lawsuit has finally come to an end. The judge ruled that the defendant was guilty and the sentence was “guilty of…read more

Reps for both Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni reacted to the judge’s decision and shared their plans moving forward in discovery

Blake Lively  has been granted a modified protective order in her legal battle against Blake Lively  and others involved in Blake Lively , but the court limited the scope of the restrictions she sought.

On Thursday, March 13, Judge Lewis J. Liman ruled that while certain confidential materials will remain protected, an “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” designation can only be applied if their disclosure is “highly likely to cause a significant business, commercial, financial or privacy injury.”

The decision follows Lively’s request for stricter safeguards to prevent private details from leaking to the media or circulating within Hollywood. The judge acknowledged the risk of sensitive information spreading through industry gossip, writing in his ruling.

“And where confidential information is not disclosed to the media, it may spread by gossip and innuendo to those in the tight artistic community in a position to do harm to one or the other of the parties but in a manner that might not be readily and immediately detected.”

A spokesperson for Lively says in a statement, “Today, the Court rejected the Wayfarer Parties’ objections and entered the protections needed to ensure the free flow of discovery material without any risk of witness intimidation or harm to any individual’s security. With this order in place, Ms. Lively will move forward in the discovery process to obtain even more of the evidence that will prove her claims in court.”

Justin Baldoni; Blake Lively. James Devaney/GC Images; Mat Hayward/WireImage

The ruling reinforced that AEO designations should not require case-by-case discussions if the information type is generally considered appropriate for such protection.

Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, issued a statement after the court’s decision, emphasizing that the defense had never sought the kind of deeply personal information Lively claimed needed extra protection.

“We are fully in agreement with the Court’s decision to provide a narrow scope of protections to categories such as private mental health records and personal security measures that have never been of interest to us, as opposed to Ms. Lively’s exceedingly overbroad demand for documents for a 2.5-year period of time, which the court rightly quashed. We remain focused on the necessary communications that will directly contradict Ms. Lively’s unfounded accusations.”

Lively’s attorneys had requested a broad confidentiality order that would have limited access to certain materials, arguing that the lawsuit’s high-profile nature created an increased risk of leaks. Her legal team claimed that keeping some documents restricted to lawyers only was necessary to prevent reputational harm and media scrutiny.

Baldoni’s team pushed back, arguing that Lively’s request was excessive and could prevent critical evidence from being accessed during the case.

The court ultimately rejected her attempt to impose strict limitations on all materials and instead focused on specific protections for highly personal information

Related Posts

Between KIM SOO HYUN and KIM SAE RON will have to be criminally charged because he has …see more

Recently, the Korean public was stirred up by information about the relationship between two actors Kim Soo Hyun and Kim Sae Ron. According to some sources, Kim Soo Hyun was…

Read more

WHY: Hollywood actor Gene Hackman’s fortune of more than 80 million USD did not include any of his children in his will, but left all his assets to…see more

The will of the recently deceased film legend Gene Hackman states that his wife is the sole heir to his fortune of more than 80 million USD, and his three…

Read more

SHOCK: Hollywood actor Gene Hackman and his fortune of more than 80 million USD, did not include his children’s names in his will but left all his assets to his second wife just because…see more

The will of the recently deceased film legend Gene Hackman states that his wife is the sole heir to his fortune of more than 80 million USD, and his three…

Read more

KIM SOO HYUN “I didn’t force my ex-girlfriend to pay the debt. If I really asked for it, what’s wrong? She couldn’t pay the debt and chose to leave forever, that’s not…see more

On the morning of March 14, Gold Medalist Company issued a press release clarifying suspicions related to actor Kim Soo Hyun. In it, they admitted that Kim Sae Ron and…

Read more

“Gene Hackman” passed away and the property dispute: His will was signed 20 years ago, making it many times more difficult to handle. Is this the reason why it happened? …see more

Gene Hackman’s late wife Betsy was named the successor trustee to his living trust, but it remains unclear whom the beneficiaries of that trust are Gene Hackman and his wife…

Read more

This boy took the bus to his graduation ceremony, walked across the stage without the support of his family, no one to hug or congratulate him. After graduating, he returned to the bus stop and he… see more

76-year-old star Meryl Streep and Martin Short fell in love while co-starring in the TV series ‘Only Murders in the Building’. According to Page Six , Meryl Streep and Martin Short have…

Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *